MPs - heroes or villains?

I have been trying to cure my addiction to parliament and writing a book about the work of MPs for the last few months. In a rare visit to Westminster, I went to Millbank to be interviewed by Carolyn Quinn. She was so brilliant at listening that I got completely carried away. The interview went out on  BBC Radio 4 Sunday 7th April at 10.35 pm http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p017d610. Despite my waffle, I still failed to say so much. I was going to say that after working as an anthropologist for aid charities in Africa and Asia and watching the UK parliament, I view charity  workers and MPs as morally equivalent.

What makes politics exciting?

 

What do MPs do in their work, how and why? At a workshop last Friday hosted by The History of Parliament I tried to address these questions in front of anthropologists, politics scholars and parliamentary officials. Do I have enough here for a book, I asked? “Three books,” replied one. The first may demolish some clichés about MPs. For starters, self-interest on its own is an unconvincing explanation of their behaviour. Like any other group, MPs are motivated by multiple aspirations, interwoven and in flux. Picking only one is a lazy and formulaic approach. MPs work hard in constituencies partly because they aim to get re-elected but since many of those in safe seats work up to 70 hours a week on behalf of those they represent, other motives are clearly at work as well. Solving constituents’ problems is satisfying – it leads to visible, sometimes life or sanity-saving results and forges close relationships between representative and represented. It also informs MPs about the impact of laws, policy and societal change on real people in their everyday lives.

Pages

Subscribe to Emma Crewe RSS